Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts

Sunday, June 3, 2012

Things you should know about Mitt Romney

This information came to me in an email.  I can't vouch for all the facts but if anyone knows any different please let me know.


Personal Information
  • His full name: Willard Mitt Romney
  • He was born: March 12, 1947 and is 65 years old
  • His Father:  George W. Romney, former Governor of Michigan
  • He was raised in: Bloomfield Hills, Michigan
  • He is married to: Ann Romney since 1969, they have five children; all boys
  • Education: B.A. from Brigham Young University, J.D. and M.B.A. from Harvard University
  • Religion: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints also known as LDS or Mormon
 Working Background
  • At age 19, he spent 30 months in France as an unpaid Mormon missionary.
  • After graduation from both Harvard Business School and Harvard Law School simultaneously, he passed the Michigan bar, but never worked as an attorney.
  • In 1984, he co-founded Bain Capital, a private equity investment firm, one of the largest such firms in the United States.
  • In 1994, he ran for Senator of Massachusetts and lost to Ted Kennedy.
  • He was President and C.E.O. of the 2002 Winter Olympic Games.
  • In 2002 he was elected Governor of Massachusetts where he eliminated a 1.5 billion dollar deficit.
   Some Interesting Facts about Bain Capital
  • Bain Capital started with one small office supply store in Massachusetts, turned it into Staples with over 2,000 stores employing 90,000 people.
  • Bain Capital also worked to perform the same kinds of business miracles again and again with companies like Domino's, Sealy, Brookstone, The Weather Channel, Burger King, Warner Music Group, Dollarama, Home Depot, and many others.
Mitt Romney's Volunteer Service
  • He was an unpaid volunteer campaign worker for his dad's gubernatorial campaign for one year.
  • He was an unpaid intern in his dad's governor's office for eight years.
  • He was an unpaid bishop and stake president for the LDS Church for ten years.
  • He was an unpaid President of the Salt Lake Olympic Committee for three years.
  • He took no salary and was the unpaid Governor of Massachusetts for four years.
  • He gave his entire inheritance from his father to charity.
  •  Mitt Romney is one of the wealthiest self-made men in our country but has given more back to its citizens in terms of money, service and time than most men.
 Mitt Romney is Trustworthy
  • He will show us his birth certificate.
  • He will show us his high school and college transcripts.
  • He will show us his social security card.
  • He will show us his law degree.
  • He will show us his draft notice.
  • He will show us his medical records.
  • He will show us his income tax records.
  • He will show us he has NOTHING to hide.
Mitt Romney's background, experience and trustworthiness show him to be a great leader and an excellent President of the United States.

Friday, May 25, 2012

Mitt Romney, Meadow Mountain Massacre and The Mormon Church

“Whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed; for in the image of God made he man.”--Genesis 9:6
“Remember the worth of souls is great in the sight of God.”--D&C 18:10

In an article written by Sandhya Somashekhar, published by the Washington Post newspaper on May 20, 2012, (“Mitt Romney’s Mormon faith tangles with a quirk of Arkansas history”) a strange connection was made between Mitt Romney, presumptive Republican candidate for President of the United States, and the Meadow Mountain Massacre of 1857 in Utah.

This horrible massacre took place on September 11, 1857. It involved a wagon train of about 120 men, women and children mostly from Arkansas migrating through Utah on their way to California. Only 17 children were spared. This crime was carried out by “some 50 to 60 local militiamen in southern Utah aided by American Indian allies.” (The Ensign Magazine, “The Mountain Meadow Massacre,” Richard E. Turley, Jr., Sept. 2007.)  The tragedy has been a source of great sorrow for us, as members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, for over 150 years.

To understand the background of why this might have happened (although it doesn’t excuse it), we need to look back into the history of the Church. It took place only 13 years after the Prophet Joseph Smith and his brother, Hyrum, were martyred by an angry mob at Carthage, Illinois; and, after the forced exodus and persecution of the Saints from Illinois and Missouri to the west and the security of a safe haven in the Salt Lake Valley in 1847. Now, in 1857, once again “disagreements, miscommunication, prejudices, and political wrangling on both sides had created a growing divide between the territory and the federal government” and an Army of about 1500 soldiers “was marching toward Utah Territory.” (ibid.)  In 1848, a peace was negotiated and no battle was ever fought.

Ultimately, only one man, John D. Lee, was tried and executed for the massacre although nine others were indicted for their participation but were never brought to trial. Some remained in Utah and were “ostracized” by their neighbors but most escaped to other parts of the country. “Sharon Chambers of Salt Lake City is a great-granddaughter of child survivor [of the massacre], Rebecca Dunlap.”  She states, “The people who did this had lost their way. I don’t know what was in their minds or in their hearts,” she said. “I feel sorrow that this happened to my ancestors. I also feel sorrow that people have blamed the acts of some on an entire group, or on an entire religion.” (ibid.)

My question is this: Why is the Washington Post trying to connect Mitt Romney with something that has nothing to do with either him or the Church that happened 156 years ago?  Granted, it is a controversial subject. Even today, many distortions and false accusations are made against Latter-day Saint Church leaders of that time with no evidence of proof.  However, this Washington Post newspaper article is not about what happened 156 years ago, per se.  I believe it is an attempt to show Romney’s Mormon religion in a bad light.

Now here’s something you can take to the bank! According to “Statistics of the Church” compiled by the LDS Church in April 2012, and published on lds.org:

  • Value of [LDS] Humanitarian Assistance Since 1985 ---------------------1.3 Billions
  • Countries Receiving Humanitarian Aid [from the LDS Church] Since 1985-------179

Also found on the website lds.org: “The humanitarian services arm of the [LDS] Church sponsors five ongoing global projects to help people become more self-reliant. Initiatives include neonatal resuscitation training, clean water projects, wheelchair distribution, vision treatment, and measles vaccinations.”

In an article by John J. Dilulio, Jr., published in the magazine, America, the National Catholic Weekly, titled “Mormons and Charity,” (April 9, 2012), he states:

“In a report issued in January 2012, ...a research team representing the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life found that most Mormons are regular churchgoers and that more Mormons (73 percent) believe that ‘working to help the poor’ is ‘essential to being a good Mormon.'

“According to a new study previewed on March 15 by an expert panel convened at Pew’s headquarters in Washington, D.C., most members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints practice what they preach about helping the needy. [The study] concludes that churchgoing Mormons ‘are the most pro-social members of American society’ (emphasis added). On average, Mormons dedicate nine times as many hours per month (nearly 36 hours) to volunteer activities than other Americans do. Mormons reliably tithe to their churches and also give about $1,200 annually ‘to social causes outside the church.’”

It would be nice, for once, if the main-stream press would stop trying to do “the gotcha” and work harder to publish the honest facts without all their distortions and dishonesty on issues that are current in the 2012 here and now. I know that is asking a lot, and if it doesn’t happen, thank heaven for the Internet where the truth can be found and published.

Monday, May 21, 2012

Economic Terriorism and Frank VanderSloot

Is it economic terrorism as Bill O' Reilly asked on his Fox News show, or is it just your normal run-of-the-mill vicious political character assassination?  You decide for yourself after reading this blog.  I promised to tell the truth and not be contentious.  I didn't say that what I write won't be controversial.  This post is one of those.  After all, it is my blog, so my thoughts and opinions are just that.

I heard and saw on The O'Reilly Factor show on May 14th that a businessman, Frank VanderSloot, who  was named on an Obama re-election website along with seven others, was one of  "a group of wealthy individuals with less-than-reputable records.  Quite a few have been on the wrong side of the law, others have made profits at the expense of so many Americans, and still others are donating to help ensure Romney puts beneficial policies in place for them."  (Keeping GOP Honest.com: Behind the curtain)

Frank VanderSloot is the founder and CEO of Melaleuca, a wellness-product company based in Idaho Falls, Idaho, and a contributor to Restore our Future, the Super PAC that supports Mitt Romney.  For this contribution to the Romney campaign and other attempts to defend his beliefs in the past, he has been branded by "Keeping GOP Honest" as "litigious, combative, and a bitter foe of the gay rights movement."  VamderSloot claimed on the Factor show that the first while after he was listed on Obama's website, he lost some 200 Melaleuca customers before he started fighting back against the false charges with conference calls and a personal response on the Internet (Frank VanderSloot Responds.com).  He wrote: "Melaleuca employs over 3,000 people worldwide.  And thousands more rely on us to send them a check in support of their independent businesses each month.  Damage to Melaleuca results in damage to their lives also.  When we defend our company, we are also defending them and their income.  We agree that we need to do that fairly and responsibly."

It is easy to find why so many false charges by those supporting Obama were made against VanderSloot.  A short study on the Internet of his past and present activism includes the following:
  • He is accused of being a billionare bully.  He states, "I fear my financial status has been greatly exaggerated.  I do own a majority interest in Melaleuca" which would have to be sold, and he states flatly, "I'm not selling."
  • His business is accused of being a MLM/pyramid scheme which he says it is not.  "In Melaleuca's case there is no investment and no getting others to invest.  We do pay commissions to those who have referred customers based on what those customers purchase. ...And there's no way for customers to lose either when they're buying high-quality products at grocery store prices.  Customers just order the products they use every month directly from the factory."
  • He is accused of "outing" a gay man, Peter Zukerman, a former reporter for the Idaho Falls Post-Register.  Mr. Zuckerman wrote a series of articles "exposing the sex abuse scandal" in respect to Boy Scout and LDS Church leaders in the area.  The following was published by Melaleuca in the Post-Register on June 5, 2005:  "Much has been said on a local radio station and throughout the community, speculating that the Boy Scout's position of not letting gay men be Scout Leaders, and the LDS Church's position that marriage should be between a man and a woman may have caused Zuckerman to attack the scouts and the LDS Church through his journalism.  We think it would be very unfair for anyone to conclude that is what is behind Zuckerman's motives.  It would be wrong to do.  The only known facts are, that for whatever reason, Zuckerman chose to weave a story that unfairly, and without merit paints Scout leaders and church leaders to appear unscrupulous, and blame them for the molestation of little children.  That too, is wrong, and the editors of the Post-Register should not have allowed it." 
  • He was accused of spending "big bucks" in 1999 on ads in an effort to force Idaho Public TV to cancel a publicly-funded movie that was favorable to the gay and lesbian lifestyle to be shown to school children.  He was successful only in getting the show moved to a later time period on the PBS station.
  • He is accused of being anti-gay but states in his response: "Our company has thousands of gay customers, independent marketing executives, and employees.  I believe they feel welcome and valued.  I believe that people deserve freedom, respect, and privacy in their own lives.  I believe that gay people should have the same freedoms and rights as any other individual." 
  • His wife made a $100,000 donation to help defeat the Proposition 8 gay marriage referendum in California.
I cannot believe the injustice and intolerance that has been heaped on this man, his family and his business.  He does not deserve it.  Is there no longer a place for religious freedom in this country where a person can support moral beliefs and issues?  How about freedom of speech?  Are we to be condemned for supporting and contributing to presidential candidates that others do not support?  Are we to be vilified and condemned as being on the wrong side of the law,  less-than reputable, litigious, combative, and a bitter foe of any kind of movement or cause--religious, moral or political--that we feel strongly about?  

I am reminded of a quote from Matthew 5:10-12:  "Blessed [happy]  are ye which are persecuted for righteousness' sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.  Blessed [happy] are ye when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake.  Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven."

(See also: Wall Street Journal: Kim Strassel: The President Has a List, April 26, 2012; Strassel: Trolling for Dirt on the President's List, May 10, 2012.) 

Note: I have never used any Melaleuca product nor have I had anything to do with Melaleuca in a business sense.  I do believe the products must be good to be so successful.